Systems Standards
In the development of industry and management methods the globalisation of the market
and
increasing competition between companies led to attempts to provide a competitive edge
by
improving the quality of the product. This gave rise to a quality improvement 'movement'
which went through several stages, with the current stage emphasising the use of quality
assurance systems as the means to ensure the best quality product and a competitive edge.
Previous approaches focused on the specific product, its measurement , inspection to
identify
errors or deviations and re-work to correct these. The critical element of the current
awareness is that the best and only way to ensure a quality product is to have an
integrated
system which addresses the critical aspects of every part of the organisation's
operations.
This development was called a quality assurance or management systems approach. It gave
rise to standards against which these systems can be audited. These general quality systems standards were then made more particular for aspects of
an
organisation's operations - e.g. environmental management, occupational health and safety,
design process, etc.
Originally, the major relevant standard for environmental management was the British
Standard BS7750 for Environment Management Systems (EMS).
In addition there was the European Community Eco-Management Audit Scheme (EMAS)
Regulation (1836/93). This has broadly the same content as BSI 7750 except that it
required the publication of verified environmental statements at certain specified times
during the implementation of the system. Its scope is also not as general as the BSI 7750,
being restricted to the manufacturing, quarrying, mining, energy, waste and recycling
sectors and it is implemented at site level only. Note that only the UK has extended it to
cover local authorities.
What EMAS adds to the ISO 14000 requirements is:
- an environmental statement verified by a third-party auditor;
- a broader range of stakeholders - notably the public and communities affected byhte
operations;
- compulsory reporting of environmental indicators, including emissions data; and
- setting specific performance goals which must be met.
However, ISO set up a Technical Committee (TC207) with sub-committees which worked
at developing ISO standards
for
- SC1 - Environmental management systems
- SC2 - Environmental auditing
- SC3 - Environmental labelling
- SC4- Environmental performance evaluation
- SC5 - Life cycle analysis
- SC6 - Terms and definitions
The EMS standard ISO developed was close to the BS7750 (1992).
In June 1995, the ISO agreed that these could progress to Draft International Standard
(DIS) stage, which means they are to be circulated to ISO member countries for approval
prior to publication.
In the meantime Standards Australia has agreed to issue these DIS's as joint Australia/New
Zealand Interim Standards.
The five interim standards are
- AS/NZS/ISO 14001 (Int)
- Environmental Management Systems - Specification
with guidance for use.
- AS/NZS/ISO 14004 (Int)
- Environmental Management Systems - General
guidelines on principles, systems and supporting techniques.
- AS/NZS/ISO 14010 (Int)
- Guidelines for Environmental Auditing - General
Principles
- AS/NZS/ISO 14011 (Int)
- Guidelines for Environmental Auditing - Auditing
Procedures - Auditing of Environmental Management Systems
- AS/NZS/ISO 14012 (Int)
- Guidelines for Environmental Auditing -
Qualifications
Criteria for Environmental Auditors
These interim standards are due to expire on November 5, 1997.
Present Situation
In mid 1997, there is considerable discussion within Europe and the USA concerning the
relative merits of ISO 14000 accreditation compared with the EMAS registration.
The sub-committees working on Eco-labelling and Life Cycle Analysis are likely to
complete their drafts in mid-1997
In the USA, regulators and companies are working on a project to evaluate new
performance measures, aiming to find ones which are better than the present media-
specific ones at showing the broad level of performance. This is part of developing the
system which can be used to simplify the regulatory process. It seems to be aiming at the
similar outcome to that to the "Accredited Licensee" which is currently being used by the
Victorian (Australia) EPA.
General Requirements of an EMS
The EMS standard requires a number of generally expressed requirements to be met by the
organisation. These requirements include elements such as
- - establishing a company policy for environmental management including the
philosophy and goals;
- - identifying, in consultation with interested parties, the significant
environmental
effects
of the company's operations;
- - allocating responsibility and committing resources to a program to carry out
the
policy;
- - developing procedures, documentation and providing training to ensure the
policy and
program is carried out properly;
- - reviewing regularly and auditing (checking) that the system is operating
effectively as it
is supposed to.
Environmental Management Systems
The benefits of implementating an EMS based on the ISO 14000 series are .
- - They are recognised as being a tool that can change the corporate culture;
- - The EMS standard is part of the range of voluntary mechanisms
available;
The standard does not specify particular environmental goals, but it does require the
organisation to identify the significant environmental effects of its operations and to set
goals and performance targets for those.
The EMS provides for
- - a systematic consideration of the environment;
- - continuous improvement in environmental activity;
- - seeks environmental benefits, not just impact reduction;
- - increases public accountability because the system requires consultation at the
stage of
determining significant effects;
Disadvantages arising out of an EMS that is certified to comply with BS7750 include
that-
- - outsiders assume a high level of environmental performance (when the system
doesn't
mean that);
- - there is no requirement for a commitment to achieve 'sustainability';
- - the standard does not specify particular environmental goals;
- - Certification does not provide any absolute standard for environmental
performance
The critical aspect of an EMS is the identification of the significant environmental effects
and
the goals and targets set by the organisation in its policy and program. The standard
requires
consultation with interested parties in determining these.
(This summary of benefits and disadvantages are from a presentation by Kate Short, of the
Total Environment Centre, NSW, at a seminar of May 22, 1994, in Melbourne)
PEM User's Manual for EMS Implementation
PEM has produced a practical User's Manual to assist an organisation to both set up an
EMS, and to keep it going. For more detail contact PEM.
On-line Manual for EMS Implementation
There is an excellent on-line EMS Implementation manual
created by Dr Andreas Sturm.
To contactPEM
Updated: May 20, 1997